Some illusions are shattered more
gently than others.
When I was young my musical heroes
were Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger. In my high school days I would often
daydream about sitting around a hobo campfire with a cigarette dangling from my
mouth and a few down and out drifters sharing the warmth with me. Woody would
be there, too, plunking away on that old guitar with the words “this machine
kills fascists” emblazoned on the soundboard. Even today I can occasionally
hear the mournful strains of the old Goebel Reeves’ tune “Hobo’s Lullaby” well
up within me:
“So go to sleep you weary hobo
Let the towns drift slowly by
Listen to the steel rails hummin’
That’s a hobo’s lullaby”
Woody died in 1967. By that time I’d already served six
years in the Air Force, including tours of duty in Newfoundland and Vietnam. I
got out of the Air Force in ’69 and adopted Pete Seeger as my new hero. I was
especially fond of his protest music. Every time I heard or saw something about
Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, or Richard Nixon, I’d think of Pete’s rendition
of “Waist Deep in the Big Muddy.” The last words –
“The big fool says to push on” – rang so true to me.
Pete Seeger died a few weeks ago. Another of my heroes has
met his Maker. Since his passing, there’s been quite a bit written about his
Stalinist and socialist ways. It’s as if a lightning bolt of revelation has
struck the newsrooms of America. It’s funny. We who were his acolytes knew
years ago that Pete was a “red.” And, so was Woody Guthrie. Neither Woody nor
Pete hid that fact, except from congressional investigators. They were quite
proud of their associations with the “Party.” Woody wrote columns for the Daily
Worker and the Soviet press often lionized Pete as a “great hero of the
people.” Pete repented for his love of
Stalin, but not for his love of communism. He maintained the party line. Toward the end of his life, long after a
million or so Kulaks had died in Stalin’s purges, he did admit he should have
asked to see the gulags. But it was too late. By the time repentance came, the
numbers didn’t seem so important. How did Stalin put it? “The death of one man
is a tragedy; the death of millions is just a statistic.”
We knew, but we didn’t mind. We listened to them and loved
them for their sentiments, not their myopic politics. They were roaring
socialists, to be sure, but so were most of us in your younger days. I never met many young people back in the
sixties who weren’t ready to abolish the right to private property. We were
especially keen on doing away with the other guy’s right to private property,
while simultaneously clinging desperately to our own stuff. Our motto was “What’s
mine is mine and what’s yours is also mine.”
Like Pete, we weren’t troubled by our inconsistencies.
As it always does, times change and the seasons of life
pass. We grow up. When we do, the illusions of our youth are
supplanted by the healthy kind of disillusionment that comes with adulthood. As
Peter, Paul, and Mary once crooned, “painted wings and giant rings make way for other toys.”
Woody and Pete
are gone, and so are the illusions. My boyhood heroes seem less heroic to me now.
I realize that they had feet of clay.
Those
illusions were shattered, but they were shattered gently. That’s not always the
case. I read a disturbing piece from the New York Times a few days ago. In a
February 1st op-ed, Nicholas Kristof gave voice to the question of
whether or not it was “appropriate to honor a man who is an artistic giant but
also was accused years ago of child molestation.” The man accused is film maker
Woody Allen. The accuser is his daughter, Dylan. Allen denies the allegations.
Who do we believe? The artistic genius who gave us “Broadway Danny Rose,” “The
Purple Rose of Cairo,” “Crimes and Misdemeanors,” and “Midnight in Paris?” Or
Dylan Farrow, the traumatized victim? What about the presumption of innocence?
Does that mean that Dylan’s words carry no weight?
I’ve always
loved Woody Allen’s films, but I’m finding another illusion shattered. Did he
commit the crime and get away with it like the respected ophthalmologist in “Crimes
and Misdemeanors?” I don’t know. It’s
all “she said” – “he said” now. But the thought of someone getting away with such
a heinous crime makes my skin crawl.
Having illusions
shattered can sometimes be a healthy thing. I rarely dream of life in the hobo
camps these days, I don’t covet the other guy’s stuff, and I’ve sworn off Woody
Allen films. I’m disillusioned. But, I’m also a bit wiser and a lot healthier.
No comments:
Post a Comment