We’re in the midst of a drought of Biblical proportions
here in flyover country and, strangely, my mind is on broken pipes, broken
levees, and broken everything. As Bob Dylan put it, we’ve got “Broken hands on
broken ploughs, broken treaties, broken vows, broken pipes, and broken tools.”
This all started for me last week. Nancy and I were in
Kansas City. We spent part of our last morning in the big city wandering around
Westport. Our primary purpose was to trade some of our books at Prospero’s
Bookstore. We had two bags of them.
We arrived in Westport at about 9:30. Prospero’s wasn’t
open yet. The guy cleaning up in front said they would open at about 9:45. So, we
made our way from storefront to storefront along the street, reading menus and
flyers. As we passed by one shop the following blurb, nestled between two “we
are the ninety-nine” placards caught my eye: “When the people clamor to be shielded from reality, when they
praise the government for keeping things from them, when they choose to conduct
their lives within the limits of whatever fantasy the government supplies, then
they are no longer consenting to be governed, they are begging to be ruled.”
The quote was from Michael Ventura, a New York City native who has been writing
a column titled “Letters at 3AM” since 1983. It’s currently published by the
Austin Chronicle.
We made our way to the next storefront, which was an Indian
restaurant. My mouth began to water as soon as I read the words “Mulligatawny
soup.” But I couldn’t shake Ventura’s words. As I ambled along I couldn’t find
myself agreeing 100% with him, but I couldn’t say he was all wrong, either.
“There’s got to be some happy medium in life, some place where harmony and
diversity do more than co-exist or make demands on those we disagree with.
There’s got to be a place where we can consent to be governed without finding
ourselves begging to be ruled.”
Prospero’s opened right on time. We browsed around for a bit and
then began negotiations in earnest with the owner. “We’ve got some books we’d
like to trade.” He paused for a second, then made his counter offer. “I hope
you’re not wanting cash for these books. I’m broke.” “Nah,” Nancy replied,
“just a swap would be fine.” With that, he made his final offer. “How about
seventy-five bucks worth of store credit?” “Wonderful,” Nancy and I responded
in unison. The deal was sealed on a 3 by 5 note card – “Seventy-five dollar
store credit for Phil and Nancy Dillon.”
Assuming that our work was done, we started to leave. But, before
we could, he asked an odd question. “Are you guys interested in what’s going on
in this country?” I told him we were. “What’s your point of view? Is it
conservative, progressive, tea party, the ninety-nine, libertarian, radical?”
“Conservative,” I said proudly. The hint of a smile appeared on his face.
“That’s alright, we can still do business.”
We made a bit more small talk and he apparently decided we were
safe to be around. “I think I’m a radical. I just want the powers that be and
the government to leave me alone. I guess that make me a radical, doesn’t it?”
He paused for a moment, and then launched into the deep. “There are only three
things I want – this bookstore, the freedom to grow a few of my “flowers” for
medicinal use, and an occasional nude walk around the block at three in the
morning.” I don’t want “them” bothering me and I don’t want to bother them.”
He’d made a pretty convincing case to me. All I could think to say
in response was, “Whatever floats your boat.”
I think that’s what we all want. We want the same things our
founders said they were fighting for – “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness.” What could possibly be wrong with that?
How have we managed to stray so far? The answer hit me like a ton
of bricks the moment we sat down for lunch at the Indian restaurant. I think
our leaders like things as they are. It’s tea partiers versus the ninety-nines,
it’s conservatives against liberals. It’s the have not’s clawing away at the
haves. We’re at the boiling point and our leaders seem to be content with that.
And why not. As long as we’re at each other’s throats, they maintain their grip
on power and do nothing but argue about the price of passage on the Titanic,
knowing that when we all hit the iceberg they’ll be manning the lifeboats and
the rest of us will have to cast our fate to the icy waters.
It’s time to stop the insanity. It’s time to come together!
1 comment:
I agree we need to come together. Being a liberal Yankee from the northeast I recognize that powers that be would prefer to keep the status quo, because why not, it is working well for them. I recognize looking left often can leave blind spots on my right, therefore I will watch fox news or listen to sean hannity from time to time and even read conservative blogs like yours. My favorite conservative thinker is David brooks, he seems more reflective and nuanced conservative. The biggest difference I came up with between a conservative and liberal is a liberal prefers to view life's answers in shades of grey and a conservative prefers more black and white. Now I am a liberal in a conservative roman catholic family. My mother supported Santorum and my brothers support Ron Paul. Having close family members being staunchly conservative can make me more understanding of this point of view. When we talk about politics we try to stay with concepts and less about politicans. The surprising or not so surprising thing is that when we get to final desired outcomes, we have many similarities, but we have different paths of getting there and different fears that can manifest. As we march side by side towards the future, I agree with you it is best to work together. I'll look out for dangers from the right while you look out for dangers on the left. Good posts keep the dialogue going!
Post a Comment