The
countdown of my objections to the Extension merger continues. I’ve got a long
way to go. As Franklin Roosevelt said during the 1936 Presidential campaign,
“We have only just begun to fight.”
Extension
proponents have tried to convince us that a merger will produce efficiencies
and economies of scale. They seem to be laboring under the assumption that
saying it often enough will make it so. But, that’s not the real world. I spent
part of my professional career as a member of a team whose primary task was
developing and implementing economies of scale and operational efficiencies. It
was something we could never undertake in a willy-nilly fashion. Anything we
developed had to be fully justified before it was implemented. We had to
quantify personnel savings. There had to be demonstrable operational cost
savings and they had to be significant. And, we had to develop a plan that
would measurably improve service to internal and external customers. If/when
upper management approved, the implementation had benchmarks to be re-measured
at 30, 60, and 90 day intervals to ensure that what we’d meet our promised
objectives.
The proposed
Extension merger isn’t even remotely close to being an economy of scale, nor
does it create efficiencies.
Extension
has also claimed that the consolidated district would enable cooperative
effort. I couldn’t believe they’d said when I first heard it, but they’ve said
it more than once. About the only thing missing was the marketing slogan –
“Consolidate to Cooperate.”
Is it
true that it will take consolidation to produce cooperative effort? If so,
what’s getting in the way of cooperation now? Distance? Good Lord, Alexander
Graham Bell invented the telephone 136 years ago. I don’t believe we’ve so
underfunded them they’ve got to resort to tin cans connected by miles and miles
of string. They’ve even got computers to work with. And e-mail is this wonderful
administrative tool that’s been around for a while.
I
actually think more highly of Extension personnel. I believe they’ve got it in
them to cooperate. If Extension leadership is saying it’s going to take
consolidation to make it happen, they’ve got some really serious problems,
problems that no amount of money will solve.
Some
Extension proponents tout the benefits to the public, including volunteer
income tax help, support in raising kids/parenting, Kansas PRIDE, etc. Now, who
could be against that? I’m not really against those things, but there are
already far better agencies involved in those things. The I.R.S itself provides
free income tax support to taxpayers. So does our local chapter of the A.A.R.P.
We’ve got plenty of family support professionals. We’ve got a lot of churches
and plenty of competent pastors and support staff who provide outstanding
support to families. The county is also blessed with a wealth of civic
organizations who volunteer time and treasure to help their neighbors through
difficult times, including Lions Club, Habitat for Humanity, Kiwanis, the
Salvation Army, Sertoma, and so forth. There are a lot of caring people in Lyon
County.
Extension
also has been talking up its slate of youth activities. Those of us who are
against the merger believe these things are great. But, keep in mind that these
activities have been supported thanks to the generous allocation Lyon County
has given our local Extension service. A no vote in the primary election
wouldn’t change that. We’ve been generous. We’ll continue to be generous.
There’s
something else to consider. As with other activities, there are other
organizations here in Lyon County who support youth activities. A few months
back Lyon Countians were graced with visits from Girl Scouts making their
annual pitch. We love seeing them. I don’t know the names of the girls who
visit you, but for Nancy and me it was Sidney Baldwin and Makayla Gray. Their
marketing skills and charms seem to have grown exponentially over the years. By
the time we’d placed and received our orders this year we had enough cookies to
fill a cupboard to overflowing. We’re glad to do it. It’s our voluntary way of supporting wonderful
youth activities.
One of
the things we’re especially grateful for is the fact the Girls Scouts have
never levied taxes against us. They learn. They market. They sell. They succeed.
Of course, it never
would have come to this if the County Commissioners had listened to the people.
When it came time to vote, Commissioner Martin said public opinion in his
district was fifty-fifty. Commissioner Walters said opinion in hers was against
the merger. Yet, they voted for the merger. The public might have understood if
there was some moral reason for their doing so, but there wasn’t. It was
politics at its very worst. There was nothing wrong with things as they had
been. And, there is absolutely no reason why they shouldn’t stay that way.
No comments:
Post a Comment