The August 7th primary
election is less than a month away.
The issue of whether or not the
people of Lyon County will approve the merger of our local extension with the
Frontier district is on the ballot. Thanks to all those who petitioned, we get
to decide. I’m one of the many Lyon Countians who is against the merger. I’m
going to vote “NO!”
The lines in the debate have been
drawn. I’ve read the pro merger literature and I’ve seen nothing that convinces
me to change my vote. The more I see, the more I’m convinced that this merger
isn’t a good idea.
It’s not a good idea for many
reasons.
First, an approved merger will give
the new district independent, unlimited taxing authority over the people of
Lyon County. Merger proponents don’t like to hear that, but facts are facts.
What would that mean for Lyon
County? Lyon County currently provides a $223,900 budget allocation to our
local extension. The merger would increase our contribution to the merged
district by 36.5%. That’s an increase of about $82,000 over our current
contribution. Then, when motor vehicle taxes are factored in, Lyon County’s
contribution increases by $123,000 over our current provision. That’s an
increase of 54.9%!
If the merger is approved, Lyon
County would be providing 40.8% of the total extension district’s support.
Merger proponents have claimed that
the history of extension districts has demonstrated that mill levies have
“almost always” gone done once the merger is approved. That’s not true. Based
on the actual history, there are about as many districts where the levy has
gone up as have gone down. The Meadowlark district levy has increased by 22.25%
since 2006. River Valley’s has increased by 22.55% during the same time frame.
Sunflower district’s have increased by 15.51% since 2007. Based on the
Meadowlark district’s history, the individual taxpayer in Lyon County could
easily expect an increase of 67% in his or her contribution to extension.
Merger proponents have claimed that
any increase to the
taxpayer wouldn’t amount to much. I think people know better. The increase
would mean that Lyon Countians would have less disposable income, a cart or two
of groceries, a couple of trips to the Flint Hill Cinema, a few meals out after
a long, hard week of labor, or plants purchased at the annual garden show or a
local business. For a small business struggling to compete, it would compound
the struggle by a factor of over 2. Merger proponents say the increase wouldn’t
amount to much. The truth is, it’s like telling the frog plunked in a pan of
warm water that the flames under the pot aren’t going to hurt him.
Merger
proponents say they will create efficiencies and economies of scale. Not true!
Economies of scale drive costs down, not up, and the merger, based on their
numbers will increase the costs of extension by 54.9% at startup! In an economy
of scale, manpower requirements would decrease. Merger proponents haven’t shown
us there will be any decreases in manpower. The truth is, there are no
economies of scale to be created here.
Merger
proponents have told us what this is about. Dale Fjell told us it’s “another
way to generate income.” Brian Creager told us “we set OUR mill levy.” A few
weeks ago, Mr. Creager said the merger was necessary so that they wouldn’t have
to operate at the “WHIM” of Lyon County.
This
merger has nothing to do with efficiencies and economies of scale. It has
everything to do with money and independent, unlimited taxing authority.
Some
merger proponents have said we are against extension. Nothing could be further
from the truth. We have no personal axes to grind. We are simply against the
merger. We believe that the best course of action is for extension to continue
submitting its budget requests to the Lyon County Commission and allow the
commissioners to make prioritized decisions on our behalf. Right now, for
example, Newman Regional Health is requesting a 2 mill allocation to purchase
an MRI machine. The County Library is requesting a 5% increase to cover revenue
shortfalls at the state level. County departments all have needs. Extension’s
requested “need” should be weighed in that light, not independent of it.
Is
extension operating at the “whim” of Lyon County? Absolutely not! We’ve been
generous. Since 2006, our allocation to extension has increased by 7.41%. For
extension, that has meant an increase of over 10% in expenditures for wages and
an increase of 20% in benefits. Overall, Lyon County provides 72% of
extension’s budgeted revenue.
A no
vote on August 7th wouldn’t change that generosity.
It’s
time to say no! It’s time tell merger proponents that their “it’s only a little
bit” strategy is a dog that won’t hunt. It’s time to say you’re not going to
continue to be the slow boiled frog. I encourage
everyone in Lyon County to vote no on the extension merger. You can do that
early at the courthouse or you can do it on August 7th at your
precinct polling place. It’s important that you vote and it’s really important
that you vote NO!